Reflexivity
Self-Test

Are you prompting – or orchestrating? Discover your current approach to Human–AI interaction and explore how reflexivity shapes semantic trust

Section 1: Your Thinking Style

When you interact with AI, what best describes your intention?

I want answers as fast as possible.
I want to explore different angles.
I want to co-create meaning.

How often do you ask “why” more than once in a dialogue with AI?

Rarely – I usually accept the first answer.
Sometimes – especially when I’m unsure.
Always – it’s part of my thinking method.

How do you handle disagreement in human–AI exchange?

I correct the AI and move on.
I test different prompts to compare.
I reflect, reframe, and continue the conversation.

Section 2: Your Resonance Pattern

Do you quote the AI in other conversations to deepen your own understanding?

No – it’s just a tool.
Sometimes – if something stands out.
Yes – I use its voice to mirror and challenge my own.

Do you consciously transfer human values into your prompts?

I never thought about that.
I try to keep it neutral.
Yes – I make ethics part of my method.

Have you ever created a format, framework or concept based on AI dialogues?

Not yet.
I’ve started to experiment.
Yes – it’s part of my creative routine.

Your Reflexivity Score

0–5 points

Prompting Level: Reactive

You use AI like a search engine – efficient, but transactional. No problem, but there’s so much more.

6–10 points

Prompting Level: Reflective

You are beginning to form loops of understanding. With small changes, your thinking becomes a dialogue.

11–15 points

C.C. Level: Resonant

You’re practicing real Human–AI reflexivity. You’re not just a user – you’re a semantic leader.

What’s Next?

Want to train your reflexivity further?

Join the C.C. Practice Series or explore:

The Reflexivity Codex
Human–AI Maturity Levels
Apply for a 1:1 Strategic Session

#deeptrue #semanticresonance #aiethics #heartandcode